|
What's your strategy for settling a case? To negotiate
a suitable settlement, you need focus, flexibility, and a clear view of
your client's -- and opponent's -- goals. Here five veteran lawyers
describe their most effective settlement game plans.
|
|

 |
June, 2003 |
By:
Spencer Aronfeld |
 |
|
|
|
It's Your Move
|
|
Set your course: trial or
settlement?
Spencer Aronfled
|
The biggest reason I have failed to
settle more cases in my career is me. I am the big problem. Why? Pride,
insecurity, overconfidence, fear, too much money, too little money...the
list goes on and on.
I like to try a case alone, but I don't
trust myself to settle a case alone. I lose myself in my feelings about
the client, the facts, the defense lawyer, and my ego. I need to rely on
others -- especially non-lawyers -- to help me assess whether a case
should be settled. I often talk about my cases with people I meet in my
community; I know I won't be able to convince the guy standing next to
me in line at Starbucks.
These impromptu focus groups have taught
me that in many cases. to reach a good settlement, it has to be your
destination. Some lawyers say it's an error to prepare your case for
settlement and not for trial. I think it's just the opposite. You have
to decide early on, Is this a case I want to settle, or try?
The answer is always easy. It depends on
what is in the client's best interest. Almost always, it's settling,
rather than taking a chance on a jury, judge, witness, lawyer, the law
itself, and all the stars aligning in the right place, at the right
time. It's not spending a week or two biting your nails in the pressure
cooker of a courtroom.
I somehow mistakenly believed that, to
become a great trial lawyer, I had to try all my cases to verdict. A
colleague once told me, over a steak dinner in the middle of Wyoming,
that I should try harder to be a great settlement lawyer than to be a
great trial lawyer. At the time, I did not fully appreciate what he
meant. But now -- having tried and lost more trials with settlement
offers pending that I want to admit -- I understand.
Do not get in the way of the deal. If you
are going to settle the case, give the defense lawyer all the tools he
or she needs to get the case settled. If uncover a good witness or a new
medical finding, let the other side see it. Most defense lawyers would
rather settle big than let you beat them big in court and risk losing
their client. For us, it is usually one client's case at a time. For
them, it could be hundreds of cases with the same client. If they lose
that client, they could lose their entire practice.
I used to think I could "fool"
the defense lawyer into underestimating me and my case. It was never too
hard to make them think that I am disorganized and my practice chaotic.
Once trial came, however, I would show up prepared and ferocious. All of
that seems good -- if you have the right client, judge, and jury. But if
just one element is missing, even Clarence Darrow could not win the
case.
The defense lawyer may work on a sliding
fee scale, receiving a flat fee until mediation, then another fee
up to and including trial. If you sense that the defense lawyer is doing
the bare minimum to get the case to mediation, conserve your energy,
too. It might be easier to get a case settled if you have n crisscrossed
the country and spent thousands of dollars on depositions, hotels, and
airfare. There is nothing worse than trying to settle a case when your
costs exceed the amount the client ultimately receives.
I also once thought that the defense lawyer had to be my mortal enemy.
But I now find that if I can befriend the lawyer (some are, in fact,
tolerable), the case may get resolved more favorably for my client. A
colleague of mine used to take defense counsel or insurance adjusters
out for lunch, drinks, or golf. At first, I thought he was a traitor to
the team. But now I see the method to his madness: The objective is to
get the case settled. And it works.
Now, when a defense lawyer asks me for a continuance in order to mediate
the case more effectively (assuming that it is not merely to waste
time), I give it. I let him or her gather more information or take
another deposition, leaving enough time for my opponent to convey the
information to the adjuster and for the adjuster to obtain authority to
settle for a higher figure.
Finally, don’t be ashamed or regret that the case settled. Even if the
amount is large, most of us think that if we had gone to a jury we might
have been able to get more. But had we gone to a jury we might have
gotten less or, sadly, nothing. Remember the destination.
SpencerAronfeld
practices with Spencer Aronfeld & Associates in Coral Gables, Florida.
|
|
|